Saturday, January 9, 2016

City Market Parking Lot Entrance onto Champlain Parkway Roundabout Intersection!


Marry the City Market South End Parking Entrance Direct to a Champlain Parkway Roundabout!

The plans move forward for Burlington's City Market South End facility at the Corner of Flynn Avenue and Briggs Lane. Now the plan calls for one entry onto Flynn Avenue adjacent to the rail line and a second from Market parking area via Briggs Lane, then onto Flynn Avenue very close to the current Parkway signalized intersection of Flynn/Parkway.

(See the preliminary plan http://www.citymarket.coop/sites/default/files/southend/City%20Market%20-%20Flynn%20Ave%20Concept%20Site%20Plan%20June%202015.pdf )

A direct, safe access of City Market onto the Champlain Parkway can be done two approaches—a Parkway roundabout intersection at Ferguson Street emptying directly into the Market parking area, or bending Briggs Lane into a Parkway/Flynn roundabout as a fifth “leg.” Either approach marries the parking area directly to a safe roundabout, safe for all modes.  The Burlington Onion River Coop "City Market" is the highest revenue coop market in the United States.  

Either roundabout design allows the benefits of closing the intersection of Briggs Lane and Flynn Avenue, providing up to a third of an acre of available land along the east side of the Market between Flynn and Ferguson west of the Parkway, direct Parkway to Market access for all deliveries, and sharply reducing traffic on the difficult Flynn/Market entrance on the west side of the Market.

The Burlington Walk Bike Council and Safe Streets Burlington group both call for all roundabouts along the Parkway. And, since the Parkway becomes, essentially, a local street once it reaches Home Avenue, adding another roundabout intersection at Ferguson/City Market makes good sense as Market traffic will very likely reach about ten percent of the intersection total traffic, the rule of thumb for minor roadway traffic for roundabout feasibility.

If a Ferguson roundabout is chosen about a third of an acre of the former Biggs Lane becomes available, and those traveling from the nearby Ferguson Street neighborhood, particular walking or biking, would have much safer and shorter trips to the Market.

Either roundabout design connection with Briggs Lane helps the economic viability of the current southern portion of the Market property as well as all points south to Home Avenue.

Roundabouts work just fine with five or six or more private and/or roadway entries. The Montpelier US 2/302 roundabout features three roadway legs and two private accesses along with a third likely when a vacant property is developed. Here is the beautiful downtown 5-leg Glens Falls, NY Centennial Circle roundabout, just google: Images for glens falls roundabout

The U-tube “Glens Falls Loves Roundabout” tells the story: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHnY8IGv1sY



Monday, January 4, 2016

Cleansing Burlington's "dirty 17" high per crash locations with roundabouts

1/3/2016 Revision 1


Cleaning the “Dirty 17” Burlington, VT One-a-Year Pedestrian Injury Intersections to About One a Decade Average with Roundabouts--Opportunities and Costs

Summary

As analyzed here, cleansing 15 of the “dirty 17” Burlington intersections averaging one pedestrian injury a year occurs by converting them to roundabouts. After conversion pedestrian crashes would drop from15 pedestrian injuries a year now to one or two a year. The 90% reduction in pedestrian crashes prediction is based on single lane roundabout research and the recent tabulation of 52 years of Vermont downtown/town center roundabouts history which recorded just a single non-serious pedestrian injury. Two of the “dirty 17” intersections—one during the 2011-2014 data collected in the Walk Bike Master Plan study now under way and one in 1998—recorded a pedestrian fatality. The 2015 measure of the value of a life saved used by the Federal Highway Administration is $9.4 million. A recent value of a highway injury used in a American Automobile Association study (Cambridge Systematics) was $126,000.

Introduction

The Burlington Walk Bike Master Plan identifies 17 intersections averaging one (0.9) pedestrian injuries per year for the four years 2011-2014. Just now safety performance data on of five downtown Vermont roundabouts found one pedestrian injury (not serious) over a span of 52 years of roundabout operation history through late 2015. The Burlington “dirty 17” record includes a fatal injury and at least one critically injury. Since roundabout research indicates a 90% reduction in pedestrian injuries at single lane roundabouts compared to signs and signals, “cleaning” the “dirty 17” in Burlington with single lane roundabouts reduces frequency of pedestrian crashes to one per decade and decreases injury severity as well. Of the 17 intersections all but perhaps two—requiring two lane roundabouts—are single lane roundabout candidates. Note, single lane roundabouts research conclusively finds single lane roundabouts deceasing serious and fatal car occupant injuries by 90%, and research finds single lane roundabouts for cyclists reaches towards the 90% reduction of injuries if a separate path or ramp off/on to join with pedestrians for crossings is provided.

Vermont's Montpelier Keck Circle first roundabout in the northeast (19th in the U.S.) in 1995 and Grand Union Roundabout in Manchester Center in 1997 by chance are two of the earliest downtown/town center roundabouts in the U.S. and Canada. Now along with two more roundabouts in Manchester Center and the Main Street Roundabout in Middlebury, this group of five become first to reach 52 years of service with both significant volumes of pedestrians but also an ongoing tabulation of pedestrian accident data. The Vermont downtown roundabout performance does not come as a total surprise as international research finds about a 90% reduction in pedestrian injuries at single lane roundabouts like Vermont's. Still, the Vermont downtown roundabout safety performance of one minor pedestrian injury in 52 years stands in sharp relief opposite to the Burlington “dirty 17” recording one pedestrian crash per year 2011-2014 with one fatality and at least one critical injury.

The question can be asked “what if” the pedestrian “dirty 17” intersections in Burlington were converted to a roundabout, what would be the costs? Using the rule of thumb of a 90% reduction of pedestrian injuries of roundabouts over signed or signalized intersections, the 17 injuries a year at the Burlington intersection would drop to less than two per year. The U.S. sinking from first to 19th in highway safety with over 40% of the 30,000 annual deaths prevented by reaching top nations in highway safety, this analysis is far more than a theoretical exercise. Further in the last decade as more walk and bike--”healthy transportation”--walk and bike fatalities have plateaued and even increased, and have become a higher proportion of overall highway fatalities as both modes vulnerability in crashes with vehicles is obvious and practically impossible to alter in a significant way.

The following analysis makes these assumptions;

  1. Any consideration of roundabouts at a high accident location—like the “dirty 17”-- requires a full engineering study involving an experienced roundabout designer. (Vermont remains one of the rare states where almost all the long time roundabout practitioners have either presented workshops in the State or done design work here—in some cases both.)
  2. At some point—the sooner the better--high accident intersections in Burlington will be evaluated for roundabout or other major safety upgrade, and a list of intersections will be prioritized—ditto for Chittenden County which lacks a single safe roundabout intersection on a busy public street.
  3. The cost assumptions here are that the projects will be done without use of federal funding. Costs would be roughly 75% higher with the involvement of federal funds. Where federal funds are known to be involved (Shelburne Street Roundabout and Champlain Parkway intersections) a “federal” estimate is provided.
  4. Mini-roundabouts can be built with very low costs. A high-end figure of $50,000 will be used in these estimates.
  5. All estimates are those of the author based on experience—they are “ballpark” only and can only be refined by engineering studies.
  6. All intersections would include separate walk and bike treatment or, mostly likely given constraints, off/on ramping to give a cyclist the choice of “taking the circulating travelway” or “ramping off” onto shared pedestrian space, proceeding across crosswalk(s) before “ramping on” to the street to continue on (this is the Shelbune Street Roundabout design at Shelburne/Locust/So. Willard set for construction in 2021, possibly earlier).

Estimated Total Costs for Roundabouts

The total cost estimates provided below of $39 million for 15 of the intersections exclude the possible treatments which may include a roundabout for the North Street/Murray Street node and the “area” identified in the Walk Bike Master Plan between Intervale Road and Hill Street node. The estimates for three of the intersections are for mini-roundabouts with an estimated cost of $50,000 ear. Note there are 75 signalized intersections in Burlngton and 11 conversions to roundabouts are contained in the estimates here. The North Avenue Corridor Plan includes conversion of another three signals to roundabouts. The $39 million cost for 15 roundabouts compares to the $43 million current cost estimate for the Champlain Parkway. Using a cost factor of 1.75 for federally built roundabouts (other than the three given in federal estimates, that is Pine/Locust, Pine/Lakeside and the Rotary Roundabout) the total for the 15 roundabouts is $60 million.

Roundabouts tend to score very well against alternative transportation investments in benefit cost analyses in great part because of substantial reductions in crashes (50 percent), injuries and injury severity, and low maintenance costs. In addition, roundabouts cut fuel consumption by about a third compared to signals, pollution and global warming gases by a similar amount compared to signal, sharply reduce delay for all users and provide 50 to 100% greater capacity for cars. Obviously the roundabout features a higher level of scenic quality.

Outline of Possible Roundabout Treatments for Burlington's 17 High Pedestrian Injury intersections

Note again the following 17 intersections evaluation proceeds without consideration to priority or connection with other planned City intersections except for the Parkway intersections of Pine/Locust, Pine/Lakeside and the “Shelburne Street Roundabout” (Shelburne/Locust/South Willard)--all currently scheduled for funding in committed projects and therefore are considered fully funded.
  1. North Winooski/South Winooski (North Winooski/Pearl), South Winooski/Cherry, South Winooski/Bank, South Winooski College, and South Winooski/Main)
These five intersections represent the only “corridor” where all show up on the high pedestrian crash list. This corridor and Battery Street are the only two-way north/south through streets serving the Marketplace. The Burlington Town Center plan to connect Pine Street again from Pearl Street southward through the Town Center would move a significant amount of vehicle traffic off South Winooski (and some off Battery Streets). Roundabout treatments need to be part of a corridor (Pearl to Main) approach of five roundabouts developed together as a package over a period of time as each relates directly to the performance of adjacent roundabouts. The improved connectivity from a Pine Street re-connection would result in traffic reduction on South Winooski would perhaps change some of the challenges for roundabouts along South Winooski intersections.

North Winooski/Pearl

Treatment: This intersection presents the most difficult challenge along South Winooski. Only the southwest quadrant presents the possibility of a roundabout. Roundabouts do can be off center in an intersection. Still a major traffic calming treatment is required to reduce pressure on the Church/Pearl mid-block crossing. Cost: $3 million (if feasible).
South Winooski/Cherry

Treatment: A single lane roundabout can be fashioned with use of institutional right-of-way to the east and possibility a slight amount from the Rite Aid site (Rite Aide gets the benefit of a possible direct entry onto the roundabout). Also the resolution of revamping North Winooski/Pearl and South Winooski/Bank ties directly to design for this intersection. Estimated cost: $3 million


South Winooski/Bank Street

Treatment: Utilizing the likely moving or closure of both gas stations at the west corners of the intersections as high level economic value uses take over these two sites, space can be reserved allowing an easy installation of a one lane roundabout which would also benefit the developments occupying the space of the former gas stations. Estimated cost: $3 million

South Winooski/College
Treatment: Right-of-way restrictions from three of four corner buildings (also narrowest width between east and west buildings on South Winooski between Pearl and Main) only allow consideration of a mini-roundabout. Again, a mini-roundabout needs to be part of an overall set of intersection treatments from Pearl to Main. Since even with current traffic levels a “road diet” has been suggested, such a change would augur well for a mini-roundabout feasibility. Estimated cost: $0.5 million.

South Winooski/Main
Treatment: Likely the only intersection requiring a two-lane roundabout with pedestrian actuated signals designed primarily for those with severe visual disability. Also the most expensive roundabout. Estimated cost: $6.0 million

2. Shelburne Street “Rotary” at Locust/South Willard

Treatment: “Shelburne Street Roundabout”, single lane, 100% federally funded safety project scheduled to be completed sometime during 2018-2021. Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission (CCRPC) “Transportation Improvement Program FY 2014-2017.” Total Estimated cost: $2.9 million (100% of funding from federal sources already allocated)

      1. Archibald/Intervale Ave
Treatment: This four-way stop intersection clearly lends itself to a mini-roundabout treatment. The skewed character of this intersection does present some design challenges. Estimated cost: $50,000

      1. Riverside—Intervale Rd to Hillside Ave
Treatment: This “area” with four pedestrian injuries may be better served by traffic calming and other related treatments. A serious bike injury—typical of multi-use paths at signals—occurred at the Riverside/Intervale Rd intersection as a cyclist crashed into a car with a green light entering Intervale Rd from Riverside—establishing a barrier/buffer to force cyclists to come to a stop or a roundabout for the intersection might be possible. Treatments to be determined after an engineering study. Estimated cost: No estimate at this time.
5. North Street at Murray
Treatment: The Walk Bike Master Plan suggestion for this “area” is a “shared space” concept. Such a design could very well include a circular paving area at Murray where vehicles would enter/exit Murray in a “roundabout manner.” This approach has been used in European applications. Estimated cost: No regular roundabout to be used.

6. North Winooski/North
Treatment: This fully signalized intersection with pedestrian actuation can be covered to a mini-roundabout. With four commercial/retail buildings on each corner the intersection does generate a significant amount of foot traffic. Estimated cost: $50,000

7. Loomis/North Prospect
Treatment: This two-way stop control intersection can be converted into a mini-roundabout which will traffic calm Prospect, a busy minor arterial street. Estimated cost: $50,000
  1. Main/St. Paul
Treatment: This intersection adjacent to City Hall Park was the site of a high speed chase involving police and the miscreant driver whose vehicle T-boned a vehicle driven by Kaye Borneman, a Dealer.com employee. “Normal” roundabouts with central islands virtually eliminate the T-bone crash—and roundabouts when installed in downtowns and town centers also make high speed chases difficult and interception by law enforcement easy at the nearest roundabout. With the availability of some public land a normal roundabout may be feasible at this intersection or if not feasible a mini-roundabout is indicated. Estimated cost: $3 million

9. Pine/Lakeside Ave
Treatment: This signal intersection along the Parkway route will experience considerable increase in traffic volume with the Parkway completed as now designed. With a coffee shop, Department of Public Works main office facility and a gas/convenience store bordering, some design challenges exist. But relatively open area at the gas/convenience store site—perhaps it will have direct roundabout entry--makes it very likely a workable roundabout design is feasible. While the City is spending about $420,000 of local funds currently for a signal upgrade, the City costs for a roundabout as part of the Parkway would be 2% of an estimated total cost of $5 million as a federally funded project or $100,000.
Estimated cost: $5 million
10. Colchester/Barrett
Treatment: This intersection is part of a complex of streets requiring a larger design solution—very likely at least two single lane roundabouts. Colchester/Barrett and Colchester/Riverside Ave intersections are closely related, and Riverside also has a spur easterly enabling vehicles to cross between it and Barrett. Overall the overhaul of these two intersections along with Mill Street, a T intersection between the Colchester/Riverside/Barrett connections to the north and a few feet from the bridge to Winooski, may lead to making Mill Street one-way westerly with an outlet onto Barrett. Roundabouts would enable such a circulation solution. With likely retaining walls and other structural needs to accommodate a satisfactory engineering solution, an estimated cost may well climb to about $8 million. For purposes here, $4 million will be allocated as the cost responsibility for Colchester/Barrett. Estimated cost: $4 million


11. Colchester/East Ave
Treatment: Colchester/East Ave presents perhaps the easiest normal roundabout opportunity with publicly owned land on three quadrants and no right-of-way constrictions on on the west side of Colchester Ave.
Estimated cost: $2 million
12. Pine/Locust
Treatment: A critical injury at this intersection occurred a few months after installing a Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) for crossing Pine Street only. A single lane roundabout is feasible at this intersection because of the availability of right-of-way on the west side of Pine from property owned by BED. This intersection would likely be upgraded as part do a “corridor of roundabouts” including Pine/Howard and Pine/Lakeside intersections converted to roundabouts (up to 10 or more roundabouts conceivable along the Parkway). The cost of this intersection for the City will be estimated at 2% of $3 million (federal project cost) as part of the Parkway project, or $60,000. Estimated cost: $3 million

13. Shelburne/Home
Treatment: This intersection definitely requires a two-lane roundabout and along with South Winooski/Main (possibly) represent the only two multi-lane roundabouts among the 17 intersections. Still, Shelburne/Home will experience some decline with the opening of part or all of the Parkway, conceivably decreasing the traffic to the point a single lane roundabout suffices. Linda Ente during a trip work at Price Chopper was killed on the crosswalk at this intersection in 1998. Estimated cost: $4 million





Tony Redington
@TonyRVT08
TonyRVT.blogspot.com











Saturday, December 26, 2015

Vermont No Longer the "Beckoning Country"

The Associated Press Christmas day news article appeared in an inconspicuous place about half way into the Burlington Free Press with a headline about Maine losing population in the latest 2015 U.S. Census state estimates as we enter the second half of the decade in a few days. Well, Vermont lost population too, 725 residents, the second straight year of decline and putting Vermont's “growth” since the 2010 Census at an anemic 301 equal to about 120 additional households.

The net 301 resident growth 2010-2015 compares to the average of two Vermont official projections of over 14,000 for this decade. Certainly the 2008 Great Recession depressed the economy nationally but not so much so in Vermont. And while total Vermont population barely changes, the explosive growth in senior population in Vermont continues its relentless pace of over 4,000 a year—equivalent to a Town of Stowe population age 65 and over additionally yearly. Obviously the Vermont workforce, school age, and the total non-senior population of the State remains on track for a significant decline—a projection State experts definitely got right.

It is long past the time for changing overall state policies and budgeting to reflect the new demographic reality. Talking about increasing population of any age—your or old—to our state faces a grim hurdle—all other New England States and New York face the same bleak population trends—more seniors and less non-senior population. Some nations—Japan and some Western European nations moved into the “young-decline” decades ago and have adjusted public policies and budgets like an explorers in a new world. Politicians who run on the claim they will increase Vermont's population by 70,000 or so appear like a Kings convinced they can hold back the daily rise of the ocean tides.

The 1960s and 1970s in Vermont brought an economic boom spurred by the combination of the new interstate highways, the baby boomers coming of age, and a new recreation industry centered on skiing. There is nothing on the horizon which which change the economic and demographic tides. One obvious possibility—and it was studied by a New York/Quebec/Vermont international study—would be a high speed passenger service averaging 175 mph (fastest European train schedule average speed 179 mph) between Boston and Montreal via Vermont. Such a service would make commuting from Burlington to Montreal about 30 minutes, from Montpelier 45 minutes. For White River Junction area to Boston commuting time would be about 50 minutes. Still the speeds contemplated for the Boston-Vermont-Montreal “high speed” plan right now are only 110 mph.


In the early 1960s a Vermont promotion with the theme of come to the “beckoning country” was dropped because the growth of the State had become so rapid. Right now without any change Vermont appears to be the “non-beckoning country.”

Saturday, December 12, 2015

Why? Why? Why?


During the past months I have held back from looking at the intersection numbers along the [Burlington, VT Champlain] Parkway because quite frankly they do not reach the levels found on our busier streets and in particular the North Avenue highest trafficked section--VT 127 to Ethan Allen Parkway--which do reach near the limit of the single lane roundabout.  (Compared to any signal or signs at busy intersections, the single lane roundabout drops vehicle occupant, walk, and bicyclist serious and fatal injuries about 90%.)  

The current and 2028 numbers for each street section and each intersection are readily available in the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) traffic chapter for the Champlain Parkway on the Department of Public Works websit. 

Still looking at the Pine/Maple intersection where anyone familiar with that intersection well knows waiting 5-7 minutes going north on Pine during the afternoon peak is routine.  Good time to get some internet time when on the Montpelier-Burlington Link!

Still, a detailed look at the p.m. peak hours at the Maple/Pine intersection for 2028 with the new signal as planned there dismays.  Why?   Well, the traffic numbers 13 years hence are slightly above those today at Montpelier's downtown roundabout, Keck Circle, where peak hour delay a.m. and p.m. can be counted on a hand with three fingers. 

Yes, a roundabout--checked out by one of the foremost roundabout designers in the world as part of the AARP Workshop in September 2013 as both workable and feasible--would likely delay the average vehicle on a Friday drive time about 5-6 seconds in what is called "stop delay."   This is not a fairy tale, the Parkway consultant, CHA will tell your their Keene, N.H. Main Street roundabout dropped the Winchester Street leg adjacent to Keene State College from six minutes to six seconds during drive times compared to a proposed signal.    

What in the world is wrong with our Department of Public Works that it will not install a roundabout at Pine/Maple next spring at the 10% of the cost of the Pine/Lakeside signal upgrade of $419,000?  Why not?

A traffic signal at Pine/Maple--part of the current Parkway design--will likely delay an average vehicle 20-30 seconds, about ten times the wait time at a roundabout there.  What is far, far worse, the signal will generate more crashes and injuries over and above the four-way stop now in place (the four-way stop, next to the roundabout the safest intersection).   So the signal promises a 20-30 second wait for everyone (pedestrians face no significant delay today) as well as an extra crash and injury or two each year.  Why?

Burlington already has the "dirty 17" intersections (13 signalized) averaging a pedestrian injury each per year and so the City in its wisdom clearly is on a crash course to install another signalized intersection (one of five new ones on the Parkway) sure to add to the City's transportation unsafety.  Why?   

      Tony Redington 
 
(The message above sent to the Commissioners of the Department of Public Works does not mention the tens of thousands of gallons of fuel saved and associated pollutants deduced, scenic quality, etc.)



-- 
Tony Redington

Champlain Parkway:  Stop!  Re-Evaluate! Re-Imagine!

Sunday, November 8, 2015

Senior Boom Population in Vermont II--More Detail

Boom and Bust Sweeping Vermont—A Population Tsunami of More Seniors, Children and Working Age Residents in Decline

At a Burlington governor candidates forum November 2, 2015, all expressed concern over the need for more working age population—a Republican and a Democrat called for the State to grow its population to 700,000 to provide for economic stability.   The candidates face a Vermont tide of declining working age population, a doubling of senior residents, and collapse of school aged children numbers during the current 2010-2030 period.  The 2010-2030 State average estimate of total growth of 19,500, 3.1%, barely pushes the population needle from the 2010 number, 625,700 to 645,300 in 2030.  The estimated growth of senior age residents, 4.446 yearly, exceeds  the total population of towns like Stowe, Richmond, Rutland Town or Manchester. 

The tide of an aging population paired with declining non-senior population remains typical for slow growth areas like New England and the upper mid-West—with Vermont’s senior population growth typical of all states.  

Vermont now moves into the second quarter of a 20 year period of population decline in all key age groups but one—a senior population which almost doubles 2010-2030, an average estimate from 88,900 residents 65-years-and over to a 2030 total of 180,500.  The average population projection for 2030 places the total State population of 645,300 with seniors comprising 25.9% compared to 14.6% share in the 2010 Census.  

The radical change in Vermont population trends since the 2010 Census include a year of actual decline and for 2014 estimated total population declines in nine of fourteen Vermont counties.  In the State projections averaged, the decline in 0-19 population is 27,100 and for the prime working age 20-64 42,200.  

The two official State population estimates averaged does show a 3.1% growth or 19,500 2010-2030.  But even Chittenden County which accounts for over half the 3.1% growth for the State loses in the all the key age groups under 65: -10.8% in under 19 aged, -19.7% college aged 20-24, and -4.6 in the prime working aged population 20-64.

While Chittenden County declines in the younger population reflect a major departure from historic patterns going back a half century, the numbers neighboring county Addison startle: 0-19 age -35.9%, 20-64 age -20.7, overall under 65 22.5%.  Seniors 65 and over?  Up 112.2% from 5,100 to an estimated 10,800. 


This analysis averages the two growth estimates, Scenarios A and B, from “Vermont Population Estimates 2010-2030” published by the State of Vermont in 2013, and the report may viewed at http://dail.vermont.gov/dail-publications/publications-general-reports/vt-population-projections-2010-2030

Thursday, November 5, 2015

Senior Population Tsunami, Non-Senior Drought Hits Vermont


Population of More Seniors and Fewer Non-seniors Tide Begins to Sweep Across Vermont

At a Burlington governor candidates forum November 2, 2015, all expressed concern about the need for more  Vermont working age population—both a Republican and a Democrat called for the State to grow its population to 700,000 to provide for economic stability. The candidates face a Vermont tide of declining working age population, a doubling of senior residents, and collapse of school aged children numbers during the current 2010-2030 period. The 2010-2030 State average estimate of total growth of 19,500, 3.1%, barely pushes the population needle from the 2010 number, 625,700 to 645,300 in 2030.

Whatever the numbers, the tide of an aging population and stable or declining non-senior population remains typical for slow growth areas like New England and the upper mid-West—with senior population growth typical of all states.

Vermont now moves into the second quarter of a 20 year period of population decline in all key age groups but one—a senior population which almost doubles 2010-2030, an average estimated additional 88,900 residents 65-years-and over to a 2030 total of 180,500. The average population projection for 2030 places the total State population of 645,300 with seniors 25.9% of that total compare to 14.6% in the 2010 Census.

The radical change in Vermont population trends since the 2010 Census include a year of actual decline and for 2014 estimated total population declines in nine of fourteen Vermont counties. In the State projections averaged, the decline in 0-19 population is 27,100 and 20-64 42,200.

While the official State population estimates do show a 3.1% growth or 19,500 2010-2030. But even Chittenden County which accounts for over half the 3.1% growth for the State loses in the all the key age groups under 65: -10.8% in under 19 aged, -19.7% college aged 20-24, and -4.6 in the prime working aged population 20-64.

While Chittenden County declines in the younger population reflect a major departure from historic patterns going back a half century, the numbers neighboring county Addison startle: 0-19 age -35.9%, 20-64 age -20.7, overall under 65 22.5%. Seniors 65 and over? Up 112.2% from 5,100 to an estimated 10,800.

This analysis averages the two growth estimates, Scenarios A and B, from “Vermont Population Estimates 2010-2030” published by the State of Vermont in 2013, and the report may viewed at http://dail.vermont.gov/dail-publications/publications-general-reports/vt-population-projections-2010-2030

Tuesday, October 13, 2015

More Vermont Roundabout Corridors Arriving!

More Roundabout Corridors Coming to Vermont!
Roundabouts, about 3,500 strong now in the U.S. and Canada, now arrive in bunches, 3, 4, 5, and even more. Three or more roundabouts along a mile or two qualifies as a “roundabout corridor” and Vermont's first in Manchester completed in 2012 soon gets company with two planned and others in the offing. The first five roundabout corridor along Brattleboro's Putney Road corridor now reaches the design stage with VTrans. The commercial retail will include full walk/bike facilities along what amounts to a business strip of retail and food outlets. The business community wanting to compete effectively with nearby Keene, NH pushed for making the corridor an attractive, congestion free environment for all modes.  (Keene, NH boasts five going on six roundabouts in the City including one just outside on the road to the airport.)
Roundabouts cut serious and fatal injuries about 90% according to an Insurance Institute for Highway Safety study. And a recent study of over 50 U.S. roundabout corridors in place found little difference in through traffic travel times as reduced delay at intersections overcame the positive result of reduced speeds through the corridor.  Burlington's North Avenue Corridor Plan adopted last October converts at least three signalized intersections to roundabouts along a mixed use corridor. Four intersections comprising all of Montpelier's Main Street in the downtown found roundabout feasible include the oldest roundabout in the northeast, Keck Circle at Main and Spring Streets and a second intersection at Barre Street in pre-design, an intersection which enables final connection of Winooski East and Winooski West transportation paths (bikepaths fully lit and plowed in the winter).
A second three roundabout corridor planed along Depot Street (VT 11) in Manchester has an anchor roundabout at the Main Street over the Batttenkill River. This corridor would complete making Manchester reaching signal-free status.

In Burlington an AARP Vermont workshop report and the Burlington Walk Bike Council supports a roundabout corridor along both Pine Street and the Champlain Parkway overall about ten roundabouts.