Wednesday, December 23, 2020

Housing for All--Guns, No Rental Help for All Vermonters

Housing for All!

Housing Act of 1949  declares a need for establishing a national housing goal of “a decent home and suitable living environment for every American family.”   (Note “environment” held a meaning tied to slum housing rather than clean air and free from contamination of today.) From this beginning we now have 14,000 units “affordable housing assistance” comprised of Section 8/Public Housing/Housing Choice Vouchers/etc.,one in five renters here in Vermont today--all pegged at 30% household income rent max rents (Reagan raised it from 25% to 30% and we need to go back to 25%).  


Leahy has been able to get about 300 units yearly of affordable housing assistance in the Trump years and this should expand significantly in the Biden administration.  The one in five renters enjoy 30% income max rents today--about half the need.  VP Harris proposed bill last year (Rent Relief Act) would make 30% income rent max universal for low income through a monthly tax credit check like senior food benefit going directly into a checking account--homelessness erased overnight.  Can switch COTS to an urban youth hostel!


Cost of this is cheap, now about $100 million a year for 14,000 of the low income units now, so another $100 million a year would do it--about equal to the homeownership subsidies which have little justification.  

Still do coops, ADUs and other good things knowing all can avail themselves of such units--and avoid the ghastly specter we now see before us in City Place (current status), and the already built rich folks housing of Redstone, etc. 


Compared to the $336 million yearly Vermonters are shouldering in defense this year versus the last Obama year, $100 million to meet the needs of low income for affordable rental homes is really a piece of cake.  Military needs have significantly declined with withdrawals from Iraq and Afghanistan. 




US MILITARY BUDGET AND VERMONTERS ANNUAL SHARE 

    OF THE INCREASE UNDER PRESIDENT TRUMP 2020  

       COMPARED TO THE LAST YEAR OF THE OBAMA 

                           ADMINISTRATION IN



Federal Fiscal Year      Total Spending


2016     767.6  (Last Obama budget)


2017  818.9


2018   890.8


2019    904.3


2020          935.8  Appropriation


2021   933.8  Budgeted



Increase during Trump  2016 to 2020:  168.2 billion/year higher in 2020 than in last Obama expenditure in 2016.  VT per capita share of increase ($2 million/billion): $336 million/year additional per capita support versus 2016 last Obama budget.  Cost of 14,000 HUD 30% household income max per month rental program (about 40% of need) ~$104 million


Source:  The Balance https://www.thebalance.com/u-s-military-budget-components-challenges-growth-3306320


Wednesday, November 25, 2020

Burlington Senior Population Climbs Sharply 2010-2019, Now 12% of City Residents

Burlington Senior Population Jumps 2010-2019


While Burlington remains forever young with  some 15,000 college students from UVM, Champlain College and Saint Michael’s residing here, the greying of Vermont seeped into its population since 2010.  


If Census 11.7% of Burlington’s 2019 estimated population of 42,819 is 65-and-over gets confirmed by the Census this year, then the 5,010 senior population 2010-2019 growth jumped 1,024 or 25.7% from the 3,986 2010 number.  Burlington senior population actually declined 104 between 2000-2010.  


Still, while Census estimates the City gained 402 residents 2010-2019, the 1,024 senior growth more than doubles that number--this means 2010-2019 non-senior (under 65) population declined, about 622 residents!


So from 2010 to 2019, the percentage of senior population in the Queen City increased from 10.3% to 12.2% of all residents.


Meanwhile, statewide Vermont is in the process of a 2010-2030 senior growth leading its share of total population from 12% to 24% during the period.  Averaging the two official state projections, each year during the 2010-2030 period a town size of Stowe, about 4,000, senior population is added to the state population while a town the size of Johnson, 3,000, decline occurs in the under 65 age population.  


As far as overall population is concerned from 2010 to now statewide there has been a slight decline and little increase is expected as of now through 2030.  Early in this decade another set of 20 year projections can be expected to be commissioned by the State.


Chittenden County area is the only showing any population gain since 2010 but even here the entire growth, about 8,000, is composed of seniors 65-and-over with little change those below in age. 

Wednesday, October 14, 2020

No Affordable Shelter Provided by Vermont or Burlington for the Low-income and Homeless who Must go Wanting

 The mythology of non-profit “affordable” housing by the State of Vermont and organizations like Champlain Housing Trust and the Vermont Housing Finance Agency, is just that: a myth. Only federal “affordable housing assistance”, 30% income max rents, provide truly affordable housing through thick or thin, household income or no household income. Vermont “affordable” is middle class housing mostly with rents of $1,000 or more and no protection for downturns in income as has occurred for many in the pandemic. Burlington's “inclusionary zoning” requiring 10-25% of privately developed housing have a rent—now $1,200 monthly for a one-bedroom rent maximum—solidly a middle class housing type.

There is some modest good news statewide on the federal assistance for low income, now dominated by Housing Choice Vouchers in the hands of the low-income household or Section 8 units attached to a few or all of new construction projects with a 27-year contract to assure the units follow 30% income rent max and enable public and/or private financing.

The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities update recently numbers fed “affordable housing assistance” 30% income max rent units increased from 13,000 to 14,000 units, some of that increase occurring, apparently, during the Trump administration. https://www.cbpp.org/research/housing/federal-rental-assistance-fact-sheets#VT The 14,000 units equal 13% of the 2010 renters in Vermont, about one in five rental households. Based on the 75,100 rental households in the 2010 Census, 14,000 fed units now in place represent 18.6% of all renters, almost one in five. As Vermont has a substantial number of college students in private rental housing, particularly in the Burlington and surrounding towns, the estimate of one in five renters receiving “affordable housing assistance” is a fair one.

Still, while the number of federal units have increased by 1,000, during the same period the need estimated by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities increased from 15,000 to 16,800, an increase of 1,800, so Vermont fell another 800 units behind in “affordable housing assistance” units needed. As the Vermont non-senior population is in decline as the 2010-2030 senior population doubles, the priority must be tilted towards older Vermont rental housing assistance.

Taking these estimates one step further, the 2010 75,100 renters in Vermont less 15,000 federal rental assistance units leaves 61,100 households with 16,800 or 27% of the current non-assisted renters in need of fed rental assistance. The wait lists in Burlington area—1,000 at Burlington Housing Authority and an equal number at Cathedral Corporation which serves older and disabled Vermonters with age-restricted housing mostly, overall 2,000 on the wait lists—confirms the scale of need in the Center's estimates.

It must be kept in mind that there is not overall Vermont housing plan, and neither the State or Burlington provide a single unit of fed type assistance, i.e., rental units where a family or individual pays 30% of gross income max for shelter including all utilities. Still, the Coalition of Vermont Elders (COVE) the lobbyist group for older Vermonters seeks a state needs analysis for the first time for continuum of housing and housing assistance needs from rental, homeownership, in-home assistance, assisted living, etc.

Do the Vermont, City and non-profit programs help? Yes, they do help provide a needed housing supply and do directly subsidize mostly the middle income rental costs. Do State programs deal with housing assistance needs or alleviate increasing income inequality in the housing area? Likely just slightly opposite in net in the absence of low-income housing assistance programming.










Tuesday, August 4, 2020

Burlington North-South Corridor: Separate Bike Facility, Light Rail and Sidewalk! --A Burlington Green Transport Corridor!


Create a Multi-modal Sustainable North-South Burlington Corridor by Adding Companion Light Rail to:  The “Burlington Bikepath” Gets a City Length Twin, “Ethan Allen Bikeway”?


        —the Burlington “North-South Multi-mode Corridor”: sidewalk, 

            separate bike facility and light rail 


Within a day or two of proposing a north-south separate/safe bikeway it became clear from feedback one needs to add a companion which came up in discussions of various planning and development undertakings including the North Avenue Corridor Plan, the Rail Enterprise Project (REP), Sinex’s initial public meetings on City Place and various Pine Street meetings on a workable Champlain Parkway:  a north-south light rail line.  To use a name to start (community must make the final one) let’s call it the “Burlington Green Corridor” (BTVGC).  The BTVGC features a north (from Flynn School) to South (continuing into South Burlington from Pine St/Queen City Park Rd/I 189-Parkway) a sidewalk, a separate/safe bicycle facility and a light rail line (like the new system opening this year in Montreal and found in Toronto, Sacramento, San Francisco and my other North American cities).


Most Burlington recent transportation planning centered on connecting the waterfront, Marketplace and UVM/UVMMC—that was the route chosen in the 1990s in a light rail study.  In Sinex’s City Place I even suggested a north-south and waterfront—UVM line would intersect in an underground station.  


So, a multi-modal north-south corridor composed of light rail, a separate and safe bike facilitation (protected bike lanes [cycle track] and two-way bikeway, and a sidewalk.  A plan process can get us ready for a sustainable future in the Queen City, the Burlington Green Corridor!


Here is the bike corridor put out over the weekend.  Please excuse the name “Ethan Allen”—any name should be something determined by the Burlington community at large—Alexander Twilight and Abenaki have been mentioned—Montpelier went through a public process in naming Stonecutter’s Way and the East West Bikepath, Siboinibe.


                                   ——————————

      

A series of unrelated planning, policy, and advocacy processes weave a new and very possible bikeway route from Plattsburgh Ave in the New North End to the  South Burlington border at Queen City Park Road and Pine Street—the “Ethan Allen Bikeway” route.


The “Ethan Allen” features 100% protected bike lanes (cycle track)/or a separate 10-foot wide two-way dedicated bikeway.  The difference between the “Ethan Allen” and the “Burlington Bikepath” (Bikepath) is two fold: first, the Ethan Allen is for cyclists only and, second, it is a fully lit, year-round maintained transportation facility.  


There are at least four key sections which have been discussed separately: (1) the North Avenue Corridor Plan (2014) which calls for cycle track end-to-end, Plattsburgh Ave to North Street; (2) the North Champlain two-way bikeway between Manhattan Drive and Pearl Street though the heart of the Old North End; (3) the City Place reconnection of Pine Street between Cherry and Pearl Streets; and (4) in its latest iteration, the Pine Street Coalition redesign guidelines in the form of New Street ( SafeStreetsBurlington.com ) developed this spring which extends a separate bikeway from Curtis Lumber/Kilburn Street through to Home Avenue even further on the Parkway to connect with Queen City Park Road and Pine Street, the interchange with I  189.


Two planning documents completed in 2017 provide a backdrop to the Ethan Allen outlining parts of it as protected bikelanes or a bikeway: PlanBTV Walk Bike adopted by the City Council and “Active Transportation,” the plan completed by the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission.


Here are some further important “connectors” necessary:

  1. Starting from Plattsburgh Ave, there would be a link from North Ave to the North Champlain Bikeway via Ward St and Manhattan Drive, or North Street. 
  2. A one-block “jog” occurs between North Champlain at Pearl Street and Pine Street—likely by protected bike lanes.
  3. Pine Street from Pearl to Main Street involves addition of protected bike lanes and the necessary re-design of the restored Pine Street through City Place which currently has no provision for quality, separate, bicycle accommodation.
  4. As everyone knows, there is not a single inch of protected bike lanes along the existing design of the Champlain Parkway—a key reason (along with a net loss of sidewalk and not a single inch of sidewalk along the Parkway route, no roundabouts, etc., etc.!!) the Walk Bike Council endorsed the Pine Street Coalition Redesign Guidelines in 2016.  At that time the separate two-way bikeway from Kilburn St/Curtis Lumber ended at the Home Ave/Parkway intersection.  Thinking has evolved in part from new Coalition members from the “borderlands” residential areas both in South Burlington (Red Rocks, for example) and Burlington’s southwest corner area.  So the idea came forth to extend the bikeway right down to Queen City Park Rd/I 189/Pine Street Parkway interchange.  This also recognizes the importance of City Market South End as a major attraction of walk/bike trips in a wide area.  Of course, New Street provides an at-grade connection between Ethan Allen and Bikeway at Sears Lane/Harrison Ave at Lakeside Terrace.


The above presents an outline with details that need to be filled in along the entire route through a full corridor planning effort—but if the Parkway can be redesigned to accommodate all cyclists and the City Place Pine Street altered to add dedicated cycle service, an Ethan Allen is a very real possibility!



Tony Redington

TonyRVT99@gmail.com


August 4, 2020

Tuesday, July 14, 2020

What if We Had a Pandemic and No One Cared--No Lives Matter, mostly, in the US Highway Fatalities Pandemic


What if We Had a Pandemic and No One Cared--No Lives Matter, in US Highway
                                       Fatalities Pandemic

  “Yes, ’n’ and how many deaths will it take’ till he [a man] knows that
  too many people have died.”
—“Blowing in the Wind” 1963 

The analysis that follows this introduction outlines the Burlington and Chittenden County huge proportion statewide of high crash intersections and the lack of addressing those intersections with even a single roundabout built to date.  But this data takes place in a nation which itself is in a pandemic of highway fatalities.  Here are some of my thoughts on the larger question followed by the high crash intersection analysis.

There is a wholesale breakdown in our US highway fatality pandemic with its 21,000 yearly excess deaths extending from from top to bottom—the fed level, state (note a few states/provinces make the roundabout the standard, NY did it in 2005), metro planning (CCRPC) and our particular Burlington Department of Public Works.  (My home town, Keene, NH has five going on seven roundabouts, including one on Main Street at the Keene State College/Post Office gateway to downtown paid for with $4 million property tax monies.)  When it comes to highway safety in the United States a policy of “no lives matter” mostly prevails.  I have come to the conclusion a mix of factors is involved including but limited to: simple resistance to change, lack of leadership at every level, malign and benign neglect, a black hole in highway engineering education in regard to systemic safety, publicly employed traffic engineers too often diverted from any safety concerns for those who walk, lack of a "transportation safety" Fauci--all a reflection of systemic failure.  We all know now what systemic failure is, we are daily living or dying with it in the form of Covid-19.     

Norway seems to have broken away from #s 2, 3, and 4 nations where in 1990 we stood at #1 (and Sweden dropped to 5th in the most recent numbers).  Even admitting variance in national collection data, Norway latest year, 108 highway deaths versus Vermont average of about 70 now.  They did not record a single "child" death--US 15 and under highway deaths top 2,000.  Norway is now putting in median treatments on two lane rural roadways to prevent head on crashes and it has gotten measurable positive results.  We cannot get protected bike lanes yet much less roundabouts.  




            Chittenden County—26% of State Population, 42% of 111 High Crash 
               Vermont Intersections (Burlington Even Worse!)

Chittenden County (County) and Burlington streets and roadways hold a disproportionate number of Vermont high crash intersections.  

High crash intersections are those on major roads and streets averaging at least one injury a year in the most recent Vermont Agency of Transportation tabulation of 111.  A large majority of high crash intersections (all but one in the case of Burlington) are signalized, a now mostly obsolete and dangerous technology.  Most concerning is the apparent lack of any effort in either Burlington or Chittenden County to replace injury prone traffic signals with “best practices” roundabouts proven in Vermont downtowns averaging about one injury a decade.  Roundabouts cut serious and fatal injuries by about 90%.  (See Vermont high crash locations report here: https://vtrans.vermont.gov/sites/aot/files/highway/documents/highway/Formal%202012-2016%20High%20Crash%20Location%20Report.pdf  )

America itself has suffered three decade collapse of highway safety in fatalities per mile of travel, slipping from 1st to 15th among nations since 1990, the first year a roundabout was built in the US.  US now records 21,000 excess deaths compared to the performance of the top four nations.  This is the very definition of a “highway fatality pandemic.”  Add to this the 50% increase in pedestrian fatalities over the last decade which disproportionately affects African Americans and Hispanics. US excess deaths exemplify real carnage and permanent mark on the Federal Highway Administration whose funds traditionally drive all Vermont roadway capital investments.
  
Applying the national numbers to Vermont, about 30 of our 70 road fatalities per year are excess stemming from lack of “systematic safety” which begins with safe infrastructure investing.  Unfortunately Chittenden County and Burlington high crash intersection data show them worst of the worst.  Even more disturbing is not only the lack of attention to safety in investments in the County and Burlington but the specific inattention to dealing with high crash intersections—the “BTV Crash 20” high crash intersections injuries record of 28 injuries per year represents 18% of all injuries (including one fatal) tabulated in the 2012-2016 period.   And those roughly 150 injuries a year are composed of about one bicyclist/pedestrian injury weekly and two car occupants weekly.

For the County—using the 1.4 injuries per year per BTV Crash 20 intersection—the frequency of injury (66 total) at the County’s 47 high crash intersections is above one per week!   

There is a systemic failure to address unsafe intersections in the City and County.  As the third 3-year term—9 years—of Mayor Weinberger administration nears it end, not a single one of the BTV Crash 20 intersections is scheduled for a roundabout.  In fact there are no roundabouts in the County—a “metro area” and likely one of a handful in the nation without a single roundie.  While a roundabout is on the drawing board in Colchester, Mayor Weinberger was handed ready to design/build with 100% federal funds a roundabout at the “rotary” on Shelburne Street bordering Christ the King Elementary School—and after nine years could not move to construction!!   This intersection, known in the neighborhood as the “intersection of death,” is desperately wanted by those who live in the area.  Now the target date for that roundabout has slipped to 2022.  (Note the Burlington “intersection of death” was previously in the top five statewide but was taken off the list since the project was ticketed and programmed for final design and construction back about 2010.)  Just this summer a demonstration of a roundabout at a BTV Crash 20 intersection was dropped by the Department of Public Works and now will be done in 2021—the first roundabout presence at any busy public intersection in the County.  The roundabout situation in the County and City brings into question what the use of the term that safety is “critical” in highway investments (Burlington Transportation Plan, 2011) means in actual practice.  

Vermont was an early leaders in US roundabouts in the mid and late 1990s, then faded.  The first roundabout east of Vail, CO and north of Maryland was built in Montpelier in 1995 (19th in US) followed shortly by the first Manchester Center in 1997 and first 2-lane roundabout as well as interstate interchange in the northeast in 1999 (Brattleboro Keene-Turn).  But by 2005 when NY State Department of Transportation adopted the “roundabouts first” regulations a few other states undertook significant roundabout installations (over 7,000 today in North America).  The New Hampshire Department of Transportation leads now in New England, 

         State Numbers

Overall 41 of 255 Vermont municipalities recorded at least one high crash intersection 2012-2016.  But only eight municipalities recorded more than three high crash intersections: Burlington 20; Bennington 9; Brattleboro and South Burlington 7 each;  Colchester 5; and Essex, Williston and Winooski 4 each.  

Obviously Burlington sticks out like a sore thumb with more than twice the high crash intersections of any town in the state.  And the County towns listed (plus Richmond with 3) total of 47 amounts to 42% of the State total. 

Since Chittenden County is the only “metro” in Vermont and its Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission (CCRPC) has a yearly Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) planning funds entitlement of about $550,000 (2018).  It is well known that Governor Phil Scott has been supportive of roundabouts in the past, recognizing their safety aspects as a race driver.  The Winooski traffic circle often is referred to as a roundabout—it is not one and about five of the Montpelier sized roundabouts would fit in what is really an old traffic circle design and still leave plenty of room!  The Winooski circle is in fact about the same size—500 feet by 200 feet—as the quarter mile oval at Thunder Road in Barre Town where many of Governor Scott’s racing victories occurred.  It is also noteworthy that the former CCRPC transportation policy director has for more than five years has been director of VTrans Policy and Planning Division including during the time when the VTrans secretary retained and imposed six injury generating and global heating signalized intersections on Burlington when the issue of “best practices” roundabouts came up in 2015 revisions decisions on the Champlain Parkway design.

                                          ---------------------

Finally, AAA has been a recent Paul Revere in US highway safety (see their 2017 report https://aaafoundation.org/safety-benefits-of-highway-infrastructure-investments/ ) and the Insurance Institute of Highway Safety have led in providing data and sounding the alarm starting with their 2001 research showing roundabouts reduce serious and fatal injuries about 90%.  And we must be thankful for the Organization for Economic and Community Development which hosts the International Transport Forum which produces an annual report enabling us to understand the American road safety plight within modern nations as we have plummeted to the lower depths.   https://www.itf-oecd.org/road-safety-annual-report-2019

Sunday, May 17, 2020

New Street Proposal to City, Vermont Agency of Transportation and Federal Highway Officials

Let’s shape a street the City can love!

                                     PINE STREET COALITION PROPOSAL:

NEW STREET
                     …An economically viable, environmentally sound alternative to the
 “Champlain Parkway/Southern Connector"


NEW STREET is the forward-thinking transportation alternative to the stalled, obsolete Champlain Parkway/Southern Connector project. NEW STREET incorporates many  elements of the plan, so can proceed to construction with minimal additional state and federal review. 
NEW STREET eliminates previous safety, environmental and social justice roadblocks, addressing much community opposition which has until now stymied the Champlain Parkway. 
NEW STREET protects the safety of travelers (vehicles, pedestrians and bicyclists) and vulnerable adjacent populations. It bolsters long-term sustainability and development of Burlington's South End. We anticipate that NEW STREET should cost millions less to build than the proposed Champlain Parkway project. The New Street design cuts 1.5 lane-miles of roadway construction, maintenance, and storm-water infrastructure.
NEW STREET incorporates the most recent Environmental Justice initiatives from the Federal Highway Administration, thus avoiding disproportionate impact to Burlington's predominant minority and low-income neighborhoods.  NEW STREET responds to the Climate Emergency resolution adopted by the Burlington City Council on 9/23/19 and signed by the Mayor on 9/25/19. New Street reduces pavement,  promotes bike and pedestrian travel, and protects the Englesby Brook natural wildlife corridor.



                           NEW STREET OUTLINE: SECTION by SECTION 

  1. RESTORE and REFURBISH as a two-way, two-lane road the EXISTING PORTION of the never-completed SOUTHERN CONNECTOR. This runs from I-189 at Route 7 to Home Avenue. 


A roundabout intersection at south end of Pine Street retains connection between I-189, Queen City Park Road and South Burlington. LARGE TRUCK traffic, is REROUTED to the restored CONNECTOR roadway. Automobiles, light trucks, and bikes may travel this route or travel NORTH on PINE, and WEST or EAST on QUEEN CITY PARK ROAD.

From the Pine Street roundabout to Flynn Avenue the road will be posted as “TRUCK ROUTE.” The restored road ends at HOME AVENUE.
A sidewalk and separate bikeway is built on the west side of the restored connector from Pine Street to Home Avenue.
2.   NEW STREET FROM HOME AVE TO FLYNN AVE
Beginning on NEW STREET, at the intersection of restored CONNECTOR and HOME AVENUE, light trucks, cars and bicycles may travel NORTH or SOUTH on NEW STREET, or EAST or WEST on HOME AVENUE.  LARGE TRUCKS continue SOUTH ON NEW STREET which ends at FLYNN AVENUE.
A new intersection on NEW STREET serves as entrance to CITY MARKET and PETRA CLIFFS businesses.
Between HOME  AVENUE AND FLYNN AVENUE the sidewalk and separate bikeway continue on the West (City Market) side of NEW STREET as well a sidewalk on the East side.   


NEW STREET replaces BRIGGS STREET and a small section of BATCHELDER STREET in the new design remains as in the current design on the east side for residences access to the adjacent Addition road network.



From NEW STREET intersection with Flynn Avenue cars and light trucks will be routed  WEST and EAST on Flynn and SOUTH on NEW STREET. LARGE TRUCKS are REROUTED West on FLYNN.
3.  NEW STREET ENDS AT FLYNN AVENUE—SIDEWALK AND SEPARATE BIKEWAY CONTINUE TO MAIN STREET   
The Westside sidewalk and separate bikeway continue NORTH to ENGLESBY BROOK—the sidewalk and separate bikeway crossing the Brook will likely feature an historic iron bridge of the VTrans program of historic preservation.  The sidewalk and separate bikeway continue to Sears Lane and through to Lakeside Avenue.   At Lakeside Avenue the sidewalk and bikeway turn East one block to Pine Street, then North toward downtown on the  Westside of Pine to Kilburn Street-Curtis Lumber. From Kilburn Street  to Main Street the sidewalk continues and bicyclists use a protected bike lanes on Pine Street.  No traffic signals would be installed at either Pine Street/Maple Street or Pine Street/King Street intersections. 


May 16, 2020   Pine Street Coalition L3C     Rev. 1

SafeStreetsBurlington.com

Pine Street Coalition New Street Proposal--A Street our South End and City Can Love!!

 Let’s shape a street the City can love! 

                                     PINE STREET COALITION PROPOSAL:

NEW STREET
                     …An economically viable, environmentally sound alternative to the
 “Champlain Parkway/Southern Connector"
NEW STREET is the forward-thinking transportation alternative to the stalled, obsolete Champlain Parkway/Southern Connector project. NEW STREET incorporates many  elements of the plan, so can proceed to construction with minimal additional state and federal review. 
NEW STREET eliminates previous safety, environmental and social justice roadblocks, addressing much community opposition which has until now stymied the Champlain Parkway. 
NEW STREET protects the safety of travelers (vehicles, pedestrians and bicyclists) and vulnerable adjacent populations. It bolsters long-term sustainability and development of Burlington's South End. We anticipate that NEW STREET should cost millions less to build than the proposed Champlain Parkway project. The New Street design cuts 1.5 lane-miles of roadway construction, maintenance, and storm-water infrastructure.
NEW STREET incorporates the most recent Environmental Justice initiatives from the Federal Highway Administration, thus avoiding disproportionate impact to Burlington's predominant minority and low-income neighborhoods.  NEW STREET responds to the Climate Emergency resolution adopted by the Burlington City Council on 9/23/19 and signed by the Mayor on 9/25/19. New Street reduces pavement,  promotes bike and pedestrian travel, and protects the Englesby Brook natural wildlife corridor.





                           NEW STREET OUTLINE: SECTION by SECTION 

  1. RESTORE and REFURBISH as a two-way, two-lane road the EXISTING PORTION of the never-completed SOUTHERN CONNECTOR. This runs from I-189 at Route 7 to Home Avenue. 
A roundabout intersection at south end of Pine Street retains connection between I-189, Queen City Park Road and South Burlington. LARGE TRUCK traffic, is REROUTED to the restored CONNECTOR roadway. Automobiles, light trucks, and bikes may travel this route or travel NORTH on PINE, and WEST or EAST on QUEEN CITY PARK ROAD.

From the Pine Street roundabout to Flynn Avenue the road will be posted as “TRUCK ROUTE.” The restored road ends at HOME AVENUE.
A sidewalk and separate bikeway is built on the west side of the restored connector from Pine Street to Home Avenue.
2.   NEW STREET FROM HOME AVE TO FLYNN AVE
Beginning on NEW STREET, at the intersection of restored CONNECTOR and HOME AVENUE, light trucks, cars and bicycles may travel NORTH or SOUTH on NEW STREET, or EAST or WEST on HOME AVENUE.  LARGE TRUCKS continue SOUTH ON NEW STREET which ends at FLYNN AVENUE.
A new intersection on NEW STREET serves as entrance to CITY MARKET and PETRA CLIFFS businesses.
Between HOME  AVENUE AND FLYNN AVENUE the sidewalk and separate bikeway continue on the West (City Market) side of NEW STREET as well a sidewalk on the East side.   




NEW STREET replaces BRIGGS STREET and a small section of BATCHELDER STREET in the new design remains as in the current design on the east side for residences access to the adjacent Addition road network.

From NEW STREET intersection with Flynn Avenue cars and light trucks will be routed  WEST and EAST on Flynn and SOUTH on NEW STREET. LARGE TRUCKS are REROUTED West on FLYNN.



3.  NEW STREET ENDS AT FLYNN AVENUE—SIDEWALK AND SEPARATE BIKEWAY CONTINUE TO MAIN 
STREET   
The Westside sidewalk and separate bikeway continue NORTH to ENGLESBY BROOK—the sidewalk and separate bikeway crossing the Brook will likely feature an historic iron bridge of the VTrans program of historic preservation.  The sidewalk and separate bikeway continue to Sears Lane and through to Lakeside Avenue.   At Lakeside Avenue the sidewalk and bikeway turn East one block to Pine Street, then North toward downtown on the  Westside of Pine to Kilburn Street-Curtis Lumber. From Kilburn Street  to Main Street the sidewalk continues and bicyclists use a protected bike lanes on Pine Street.  No traffic signals would be installed at either Pine Street/Maple Street or Pine Street/King Street intersections. 



May 16, 2020   Pine Street Coalition L3C     Rev. 1
SafeStreetsBurlington.com