FORCED
BUSING—AN UNFAIR COMMUTER TRANSPORTATION PRACTICE
Feel
“transportation discrimination”? Well be a commuter in or out of
Burlington, VT exercising “commuter choice” by abandoning the car
and what do you get?--second-class transportation in the form of a
stuffy, jammed and sometimes standing room only bus (and room for
only two bicycles). Welcome to the transportation quality of service
typically found in less developed nations!
The
first paragraph clearly paints a totally unfair picture of the
Chittenden County Transportation's (CCTA) spectacularly successful
commuter buses, the “Link” services introduced in the last few
years--east to Montpelier, north to St. Albans and south to
Middlebury. CCTA ranks as one of the best is not the best public
transportation services in the nation in a small Metro. But the
first paragraph description also indisputably tells us that the
regional commuter routes by bus only, the Link services shouldered by
CCTA, primarily reflect a State responsibility, a failed
responsibility to date marked by clear lack of foresight and policy
direction. The commuter environment shows, again, the citizens and
their demand for modern transportation finds public leadership either
asleep or scrambling to catch up (or both!). As the saying goes,
the Vermont Agency of Transportation (VAOT), the Legislative
Transportation Committees and northwest Vermont regional planning
agencies “just don't get it.”
Every
month Burlington bound and Burlington outbound commuter numbers
increase with 310 commuters regularly served by Link buses, roughly
20% of the potential commuter market. The three older Link services
growth since last July average 26%, not including a fourth Link
service between Burlington and Milton begun within the past year.
Regional
planners and the VAOT focus goes to all kinds of new “park and
ride” investments while ignoring in the first place of providing a
quality set of services built around self-propelled, high passenger
capacity, rail-diesel passenger equipment. Moreover current Link
services leave the State's largest private employer, IBM with its
unique railside access, unserved and a skeletal service to downtown
Waterbury (from Burlington only) with its major State complex.
Note
that free commuter park-and-ride lots and employee parking continue a
major subsidy to workers, a subsidy generally discontinued in mature
public transportation services, including commuter rail. In the
meantime all one needs to know about federal priorities comes from
the fact that every type of commuting to work qualifies the commuter
for one individual income tax credit or benefit of another except
one—walking.
Note
that a review of the three Burlington corridors—east, north and
south—market potential for commuter rail amounts to about 5,000.
Certainly an initial potential use of commuter rail based on Link
performance might well reach 30% or 1,500 commuters. The Link
services as well as shuttle connections from rail stations would
continue as a supplement and feeder for what really becomes an
overall integrated rail/bus system. Bicycle and walking modes
facilities supporting the integrated network must be a given.
Then
there is the larger question of inter-city services enabled by
current Link type services today, for examples, connecting Burlington
to St. Johnsbury via Montpelier and Burlingon to Rutland via
Middelbury. While inter-city and commuter rail services get separate
treatments in terms of federal funding, in a small state like Vermont
they naturally overlap. The recent Vermont intercity routes built
off commuter Link and Link-type services (plus Amtrak) perfectly
illustrate how both services connect an re-enforce each other.
Extensions of commuter rail to eventually provide intercity links to
every major community along with services designed to strengthen the
tourist industry also naturally grow out of upgrading tracks and
building of commuter rail services. The choices for rail clearly
find expression in three major studies dating from 1989—the only
thing remaining comes in dusting off the studies and build off the
pioneering commuter services CCTA and other public transit agencies
have built which show a new reality as more and more Vermonters want
out of the unsustainable and uneconomic auto-centric lifestyle.
Time
now to catch the growing wave of commuters wanting a quality
alternative to car commuting which awaits Legislative, regions, and
VAOT leadership. All aboard!
We agree that it is time to move forward on commuter rail in Northern Vermont!
ReplyDelete-- Or at least that this time should be soon (the state is focused on returning service to Montreal and up the Western Corridor and I'd rather have more completed projects and less goals than the other way around).
In my opinion, attacking the bus service is not strategic. It's clearly a success, even if not as much as rail might be. I think winning coalitions work better when they can be broad and not divisive. I think the CCTA will have to be on board for rail service to happen and thrive. I've seen efforts falter when they try to pit one service against another.
For some people the bus will work better than rail service and I'd have no problem if they existed side by side. It can serve UVM, Fletcher-Allen, National Life and downtown Burlington better than the train. I thin there are enough different markets like UVM, etc that some people will take the bus who would otherwise have driven rather than ride the train.