The
Burlington Climate Action Plan (BCAP) just issued apparently contains
a serious overstatement of transportation growth in the three year
analyzed, 2007-2010. Transportation, mostly car and truck travel, is
the area which contributes about half of all global warming emissions
in the City and the State. But, Vermont gasoline consumption
declined 8% 2000-2010, as reported in the annual Federal Highway
Administration statistics series. In fact the Vermont trend, if
continued, would easily bring us to 1990 numbers by 2020 in view of
stalled car travel and new vehicle fuel efficiency standards.
Average motor fuel use for New England states increase was barely
0.6% average total for the 2000-2010 decade. Note the historic low New England State
average car travel increase reached barely 3% last decade and Rhode Island car
travel actually went negative.
Even more impressive data calls BCAP transportation data,
conclusions and policies into question. In addition about 500
commuters to and from Burlington using the Chittenden County
Transportation Authority (CCTA) "Link" services dailty by
next June (about half on the Montpelier route with its 24
buses) traffic since 2006 on I 89 between Waterbury and Montpelier
exits declined 7% 2006 to this spring. Link services started early last decade and grew to the 46 buses each workday in three corridors out of Burlington. In addition appreciate the truly
miraculous work since 2000 by the Campus Area Transportation Management Association (CATMA) efforts
on behalf of their three key members--UVM, Champlain College, and
Fletcher Allen with their 10,000 employees--cutting solo car commuting14%, reducing student and employee car use through
providing universal access to CCTA buses, and identifying student reduction of
bringing cars to campuses resulting from both the CCTA access and student use
of a new car sharing rental service. The City needs to have the
planners revisit the basis for the BCAP study and update--the estimate of car travel growth appears unrealistic and the BCAP does not appear to take into consideration the scope of the impact of CATMA demand management for the 2007-2010 analysis period and beyond. The issue of
addressing climate change is far to important to be the subject of the apparent
shoddy work in the new BCAP plan. Planners and statisticians need to do better!
No comments:
Post a Comment